Network before token
Read the deployment-specific collateral table. A platform-wide description can miss a network restriction.
DN Decision Brief / Pilot 01
gTrade.
Know what you’re relying on.
DAI is documented as close-only on Arbitrum and Polygon. New-position collateral varies by network; Arbitrum also lists GNS. Verify the deployment and full cost breakdown.
What Matters
Three distinctions before a decision.
Fee before total cost
Separate opening and closing fees from the other costs of maintaining and exiting a position.
Evidence before confidence
Documentation describes a product. It does not establish measured execution quality, safety or your eligibility.
DN Evidence Block
The claim. The evidence. The consequence.
A dated review of two provider documentation pages. No wallet connection, live execution test, independent contract audit or eligibility assessment. Reviewed by Decentralised News editorial research. Review status: internal. Independent review claimed: No.
Provider-reported
Has USDC replaced DAI?
The current documentation permits closing existing DAI positions but no new DAI trades on Arbitrum or Polygon. It does not measure collateral usage shares.
Why it matters: Distinguish close-only balances from collateral available for opening positions.
Gains: Trade CollateralsLink to this dated claim
Inspect evidence trail
- Evidence type
- Provider documentation
- Review scope
- Provider documentation for the networks in this brief; Solana is a separate deployment. No live test.
- Underlying review
- 2026-10-22 · brief v1.1.0
- Recorded reviewer
- Decentralised News editorial research. This does not identify an independent auditor.
- Stable claim ID
dn:claim:gtrade:collateral
Sources and their limits
1 linked document from one publisher origin (gtrade). Multiple documents do not establish independent corroboration.
- Gains: Trade CollateralsReviewed 2026-10-22. Source publication/update date: not recorded in this snapshot.
What would change this conclusion?
A revised deployment-specific collateral table or a documented usage dataset could change this conclusion.
Panel published 2026-10-24. The underlying review date is unchanged. No new live test or named independent reviewer is implied.
Open annotation data v1.8.0Provider-reported
Are opening and closing fees the whole cost?
The fee guide also describes spread, price impact and holding fees. Funding may be paid or received; borrowing is a separate charge.
Why it matters: Inspect the order breakdown and holding rate; entry fees alone are incomplete.
Gains: Fees & SpreadLink to this dated claim
Inspect evidence trail
- Evidence type
- Provider documentation
- Review scope
- Provider documentation for the networks in this brief; Solana is a separate deployment. No live test.
- Underlying review
- 2026-10-22 · brief v1.1.0
- Recorded reviewer
- Decentralised News editorial research. This does not identify an independent auditor.
- Stable claim ID
dn:claim:gtrade:holding
Sources and their limits
1 linked document from one publisher origin (gtrade). Multiple documents do not establish independent corroboration.
- Gains: Fees & SpreadReviewed 2026-10-22. Source publication/update date: not recorded in this snapshot.
What would change this conclusion?
A revised fee model or a contemporaneous order breakdown could change the cost assessment.
Panel published 2026-10-24. The underlying review date is unchanged. No new live test or named independent reviewer is implied.
Open annotation data v1.8.0Provider-reported
Does this cover Gains Solana?
Solana is identified as a separate deployment.
Why it matters: Do not apply this network table or fee illustration to Solana.
Gains: Trade CollateralsLink to this dated claim
Inspect evidence trail
- Evidence type
- Provider documentation
- Review scope
- Provider documentation for the networks in this brief; Solana is a separate deployment. No live test.
- Underlying review
- 2026-10-22 · brief v1.1.0
- Recorded reviewer
- Decentralised News editorial research. This does not identify an independent auditor.
- Stable claim ID
dn:claim:gtrade:solana
Sources and their limits
1 linked document from one publisher origin (gtrade). Multiple documents do not establish independent corroboration.
- Gains: Trade CollateralsReviewed 2026-10-22. Source publication/update date: not recorded in this snapshot.
What would change this conclusion?
Deployment-specific Solana documentation would be required before extending this brief to it.
Panel published 2026-10-24. The underlying review date is unchanged. No new live test or named independent reviewer is implied.
Open annotation data v1.8.0Unknown
Can I use it from my country?
This brief does not assess legal access, account eligibility or suitability.
Why it matters: Check current product terms and local requirements independently.
Link to this dated claim
Inspect evidence trail
- Evidence type
- Unresolved in this review
- Review scope
- Provider documentation for the networks in this brief; Solana is a separate deployment. No live test.
- Underlying review
- 2026-10-22 · brief v1.1.0
- Recorded reviewer
- Decentralised News editorial research. This does not identify an independent auditor.
- Stable claim ID
dn:claim:gtrade:eligibility
Sources and their limits
No supporting source is recorded for this unresolved question. An evidence gap is not a verified negative finding.
What would change this conclusion?
Current terms and an assessment of the relevant individual circumstances are needed; this brief does not supply them.
Panel published 2026-10-24. The underlying review date is unchanged. No new live test or named independent reviewer is implied.
Open annotation data v1.8.0Deployment check
Same name. Different collateral options.
| Network | Listed collateral |
|---|---|
| Arbitrum | USDC, WETH, GNS |
| Polygon | USDC, WETH |
| Base | USDC, BtcUSD |
| MegaETH | USDm |
Cost boundary
A visible subtotal. Explicit missing costs.
BTC/USD or ETH/USD documentation example. Equal 10,000 USDC notional on entry and exit; listed base rates; no fee discounts or closing-fee decay. Spread is converted to an approximate notional cost.
Illustrative fee + fixed-spread subtotal8.00 USDC
On 10,000 USDC notional, not collateral.
3.50 opening fee + 3.50 closing fee + approximately 1.00 fixed spread.
Not included
- Funding and borrowing
- Additional price impact and execution differences
- Gas, funding and withdrawal costs
- Changes in position value or collateral value
An educational partial-cost illustration, not a live quote, total cost, executable order or prediction. Actual protocol accounting can differ. It is not applied to Solana.
Inspect the fee methodologyFormula: notional × (opening fee + closing fee + 2 × per-side fixed spread) ÷ 100. Listed rates: 0.035%, 0.035% and 0.005% respectively.
Explore full-cost scenarios in the DN fee calculator. Its provider examples are separate from this gTrade illustration.
Your research record
Save the reasoning.
Keep the date.
A receipt preserves this evidence version and your selected network. It does not place a trade, approve a platform or subscribe you to alerts.
The shared link reveals only the selected network. No wallet, account, country or balance is requested.
- Selected network
- Arbitrum
- Documented collateral
- USDC, WETH, GNS
- Evidence snapshot
- v1.1.0 / 2026-10-22
- Live tested
- No
Change record
What DN changed, and when.
Editorial history is separate from provider release history.
DN evidence revision
Rechecked both cited sources; corrected collateral availability and retained the BTC/ETH partial-cost illustration. The provider change date is not established. Version 1.0.0 remains archived.
DN publication
Initial evidence brief. Rechecked the collateral and fees documentation. This date records our review, not the date the provider changed its product.
DN editorial correction
Prepared corrections to older DN gTrade coverage and the owner-supplied referral destination; the frontend update was published on 14 October. No provider-change date is asserted.
Method & limitations
What this brief cannot establish.
- Live execution quality and withdrawal performance
- Current collateral usage shares
- User-specific eligibility and available order parameters
“Provider-reported” means an official document supports the statement. “Unknown” means this review does not establish it. Neither label is an independent safety rating. New evidence may change the conclusion.
Review triggers: Collateral or fee documentation changes; A substantiated reader correction; The 14-day editorial review deadline. Reviews are editorial; no automated provider surveillance or notifications are running for this pilot.
DN has a gTrade referral relationship. Commercial compensation is not evidence of quality. This brief contains no partner CTA and makes no operational-status or eligibility recommendation.
Educational research only. Derivatives can cause substantial losses. This brief is not investment, legal or tax advice.