DN AI Trading Series · Subscription economics · Checked 1 November 2026
A $29 subscription can look modest until it is compared with a $1,000 trading account. The bill represents 2.9% of that account every month, before any other fixed expense. A strategy could have a positive month after exchange costs and still leave too little to pay for the software.
Our previous article compared nine platforms by total trading cost. This follow-up examines the capital arithmetic behind nine paid subscription plans across five providers. It includes entry, middle and higher tiers where AI capabilities, usage allowances or execution connections create a meaningful comparison.
The title uses “breakeven capital” in a narrow sense: the capital at which an assumed monthly contribution would equal the entered recurring fixed bill. It does not establish overall investment breakeven, recover historical losses or show that software caused a trading gain.
The nine paid plans in this comparison
Prices below use ordinary monthly billing in the published dollar quote. “AI” covers different tasks: assisting configuration, turning a description into strategy logic, selecting between strategies, or connecting an external agent to execution. Those capabilities are not interchangeable.
| Provider / plan | Monthly subscription | AI-related scope | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| OctoBot — Investor Plus | $9.99 | AI strategy creation; smaller assistant allowance | [1] |
| Bitsgap — Basic | $29.00 | AI-assisted bot setup | [2] |
| OctoBot — Pro | $29.99 | AI creation with higher limits | [1] |
| Coinrule Cloud — Investor | $29.99 | LLM strategy interpretation; 1,000 credits | [3] |
| WunderTrading — Pro | $49.00 | Live connection for an external AI agent | [4] |
| Coinrule Cloud — Trader | $59.99 | LLM strategy interpretation; 10,000 credits | [3] |
| Bitsgap — Advanced | $69.00 | AI setup plus more automation controls | [2] |
| Cryptohopper — Hero | $129.00 | AI selection among configured strategies | [5] |
| Bitsgap — Pro | $149.00 | AI setup and portfolio controls | [2] |
The default comparison stays within OctoBot’s published AI quotas, assumes 1,000 monthly Coinrule credits, uses Cryptohopper’s documented account-balance payment case and enters no other monthly bills. The price table alone is not an all-in budget. [1][6][7]
DN Subscription Fee-Recovery Calculator
Test the trading capital that would cover a plan’s entered fixed costs under your own contribution assumption. The starting 0.5% monthly rate is illustrative. It is not an expected return or a recommended account size.
Enter capital available to the strategy. The full subscription invoice is shown separately and is not automatically subtracted from this amount.
Both rate methods are before the fixed subscription, usage and other monthly bills entered below. In the default method, venue and execution costs are already deducted and will not be charged again.
Usage, payment method and plan-specific costs
Coinrule usage starts at an assumed 1,000 monthly credits, without prepaid balances. The same usage is applied to both plans.
Gainium credits are consumable units, not a promise of one prompt per credit. Above its included allowance, enter a confirmed extra-usage quote; continuation or top-up availability is not assumed.
Cryptohopper payment processing excludes taxes and any account-funding charge.
The table below uses the illustrative starting assumptions.
On a small screen, swipe each table sideways to see every column. A lower conditional threshold is a smaller fixed-fee hurdle, not a platform recommendation.
| Rank | Platform / plan | Fixed monthly cost | Net contribution | Fee-recovery capital | Monthly surplus / shortfall | Fixed-fee burden | Subscription cash at start |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | OctoBot — Investor Plus Monthly billing |
$9.99 | 0.5% | $1,998.00 | $-4.99 | 0.999% | $9.99 |
| 2 | Bitsgap — Basic Monthly billing |
$29.00 | 0.5% | $5,800.00 | $-24.00 | 2.9% | $29.00 |
| 3 | OctoBot — Pro Monthly billing |
$29.99 | 0.5% | $5,998.00 | $-24.99 | 2.999% | $29.99 |
| 3 | Coinrule Cloud — Investor Monthly billing |
$29.99 | 0.5% | $5,998.00 | $-24.99 | 2.999% | $29.99 |
| 5 | WunderTrading — Pro Monthly billing |
$49.00 | 0.5% | $9,800.00 | $-44.00 | 4.9% | $49.00 |
| 6 | Coinrule Cloud — Trader Monthly billing |
$59.99 | 0.5% | $11,998.00 | $-54.99 | 5.999% | $59.99 |
| 7 | Bitsgap — Advanced Monthly billing |
$69.00 | 0.5% | $13,800.00 | $-64.00 | 6.9% | $69.00 |
| 8 | Cryptohopper — Hero Monthly billing |
$129.00 | 0.5% | $25,800.00 | $-124.00 | 12.9% | $129.00 |
| 9 | Bitsgap — Pro Monthly billing |
$149.00 | 0.5% | $29,800.00 | $-144.00 | 14.9% | $149.00 |
Fixed monthly cost includes the subscription allocation, selected processing, modeled usage and other entered bills. Annual allocation is not a monthly offer. Surplus or shortfall is scenario arithmetic at your entered capital, not a profit forecast. A nonpositive net contribution cannot recover a positive fixed bill at any finite capital.
Three hypothetical net contribution rates
These rates are after variable venue and execution costs, before fixed software costs. They replace the main rate assumption; variable costs are not subtracted again. They are not expected returns.
| Platform / plan | At 0.25% net per month | At 0.5% net per month | At 1% net per month |
|---|---|---|---|
| OctoBot — Investor Plus | $3,996.00 | $1,998.00 | $999.00 |
| Bitsgap — Basic | $11,600.00 | $5,800.00 | $2,900.00 |
| OctoBot — Pro | $11,996.00 | $5,998.00 | $2,999.00 |
| Coinrule Cloud — Investor | $11,996.00 | $5,998.00 | $2,999.00 |
| WunderTrading — Pro | $19,600.00 | $9,800.00 | $4,900.00 |
| Coinrule Cloud — Trader | $23,996.00 | $11,998.00 | $5,999.00 |
| Bitsgap — Advanced | $27,600.00 | $13,800.00 | $6,900.00 |
| Cryptohopper — Hero | $51,600.00 | $25,800.00 | $12,900.00 |
| Bitsgap — Pro | $59,600.00 | $29,800.00 | $14,900.00 |
Separate value test: does a plan justify an added fee?
The main calculator does not establish software value. This optional test compares two plans at the same entered usage and asks about an additional net contribution relative to the baseline.
This is a separate hypothesis relative to the baseline, after any extra variable trading costs and before the added fixed fee. The main contribution rate is never copied here. A lower fee does not prove better trading performance or equivalent features.
The published starting tables remain available. Enable JavaScript to change assumptions or download a comparison.
How to read the starting ranking
At the same positive contribution rate, a smaller fixed bill produces a smaller capital threshold. With monthly billing and the starting usage assumptions, OctoBot Investor Plus is first at $1,998; Bitsgap Basic follows at $5,800. OctoBot Pro and Coinrule Cloud Investor tie at $5,998. They share rank three, so the next row is rank five.
That order does not compare strategy quality. The same 0.5% input is applied to each row to isolate the fee burden. It is neither evidence that any provider will produce that return nor a claim that all nine plans can run the same workflow.
Halving the net contribution assumption doubles the capital needed to cover the same bill. Doubling the assumption halves it. A zero or negative contribution produces no finite fee-recovery capital for a positive fixed cost. Adding funds cannot repair that arithmetic.
A worked example: the $29 subscription
Conditional fee-recovery capital = monthly fixed cost ÷ monthly net contribution rate.
$29 ÷ 0.005 = $5,800.
Here, 0.5% means contribution after exchange commissions and execution effects, but before the subscription and other fixed bills. On the calculator’s illustrative $1,000 account, the assumed contribution is $5. Subtracting a $29 subscription leaves a $24 monthly shortfall. The account would need 2.9% contribution merely to cover that bill at that capital; the calculation supplies no reason to expect it.
Gross and net inputs must not deduct trading costs twice
If you start with a gross contribution assumption, use the alternative mode. For example, assume 2% before variable trading costs, monthly executed turnover equal to ten times capital, a 10-basis-point venue fee and a combined 5-basis-point spread/slippage allowance. The variable-cost deduction is 10 × 15 ÷ 10,000 = 1.5% of capital. That leaves the same illustrative 0.5% before fixed bills.
A $100 buy followed by a $100 sell contributes $200 of executed turnover. Each leg is counted once; there is no extra round-trip multiplier. If the starting gross assumption falls to 1% while those variable costs remain 1.5%, the net assumption becomes −0.5%. The appropriate result is no finite recovery, not a larger suggested deposit.
Use a consistent profit-and-loss basis. If your recorded return already includes commission and execution effects, enter it in the after-variable-cost mode. If it also includes the subscription, separate that fixed bill before using it as the input. Otherwise the same expense can be counted twice.
The Coinrule crossover: a higher plan can have a lower bill
Coinrule Cloud Investor includes 1,000 monthly credits and Trader includes 10,000. Both list a $0.02 charge for each excess credit. Credits cover platform activity, including AI interpretation and execution-related usage; a credit is not simply one trade or one prompt. Paid agents can continue beyond their allowance, with overages invoiced at the end of the billing period. [3][6]
Under monthly billing, no prepaid credit balance and the same total usage for both plans, the comparison is:
| Monthly credits used | Investor bill | Trader bill | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1,000 | $29.99 | $59.99 | Investor costs $30 less |
| 2,500 | $59.99 | $59.99 | Equal |
| 5,000 | $109.99 | $59.99 | Trader costs $50 less |
| 10,000 | $209.99 | $59.99 | Trader costs $150 less |
The first crossover comes from $30 ÷ $0.02 = 1,500 excess credits, added to Investor’s 1,000-credit allowance. At 5,000 credits, the fee-recovery threshold at the hypothetical 0.5% rate rises to $21,998 for Investor, while Trader remains $11,998. A ranking based only on headline subscriptions misses this reversal.
Annual billing changes the subscription difference, so the 2,500-credit crossover should not be carried into an annual comparison unchanged. Monthly allowances reset and unused monthly credits do not roll over; prepaid balances would also change the immediate bill. Use the calculator with a realistic usage estimate instead of assuming that a higher trading balance leaves credit consumption unchanged. [6]
Covering a fee is different from proving an upgrade’s value
A strategy can generate enough contribution to cover a subscription even if a cheaper tool would have produced the same result. The main threshold therefore answers a budgeting question. To justify an upgrade through trading performance, compare the additional fixed cost with an independently supported additional contribution relative to the cheaper route.
Bitsgap Advanced costs $40 more per month than Basic under the published monthly prices. If, purely as a separate hypothesis, the upgrade added 0.1 percentage point of net contribution per month, the capital needed to cover only that extra fee would be $40 ÷ 0.001 = $40,000. Using the strategy’s entire 0.5% return would incorrectly attribute all of its contribution to the upgrade.
The calculator leaves incremental edge blank. A higher bot limit, a longer backtest window or a portfolio control can be useful, but the feature list does not measure a performance improvement. You can also value time saved or a required operational capability separately; do not disguise that preference as an observed trading edge.
At Coinrule’s 5,000-credit example, Trader already saves $50 in modeled monthly fees. There is no extra fixed-fee hurdle to recover. That saving is a billing result, while any difference in trading outcomes remains a separate question.
Annual billing: lower allocation, larger immediate commitment
The model records three full advertised annual totals that were independently verified: Bitsgap Basic at $276, Coinrule Cloud Investor at $265.99 and Coinrule Cloud Trader at $532.99. These are public base charges, not personalized checkout invoices. [8][9]
| Plan | Annual base bill | Monthly allocation | Conditional capital at 0.5% net |
|---|---|---|---|
| Bitsgap Basic | $276.00 | $23.00 | $4,600.00 |
| Coinrule Cloud Investor | $265.99 | $22.17 | $4,433.17 |
| Coinrule Cloud Trader | $532.99 | $44.42 | $8,883.17 |
Calculations retain the unrounded annual total divided by twelve; displayed cents do not become the next calculation’s input. If your entire available budget is $1,000 and you pay a $276 annual bill from it, only $724 remains before other costs. Enter that remaining trading capital. The tool shows the subscription cash bill separately and does not silently deduct it from your capital field.
For the other six plans, a full annual charge was not established in this review. A rounded monthly-equivalent marketing label is not treated as a confirmed invoice. Their annual rows stay unranked until you enter a current quote. Account-specific taxes and other charges still need to be budgeted separately.
Nine plan profiles: what the subscription actually buys
OctoBot Investor Plus · Starting rank 1
$9.99 monthly; $1,998 conditional threshold at 0.5%. The pricing table lists ten bots, AI strategy creation and 30 assistant uses per day. [1]
This is the lowest starting fixed bill in the selected sample. Its relevance depends on whether the included strategies, supported exchange and daily allowance fit the intended workflow. OctoBot says its native AI trading strategies do not require a separate ChatGPT payment; that statement should not be extended to unrelated integrations. [10]
Extra assistant capacity and the behavior after the daily quota were not verified. Treat the starting row as a within-allowance case, and obtain a quote if your workflow needs more.
Bitsgap Basic · Starting rank 2
$29 monthly; $5,800 conditional threshold at 0.5%. Basic lists three GRID bots, ten DCA bots and 30 days of backtest history. [2]
AI Chat can propose strategies, show historical tests and prepare settings for a launch that the user confirms. That is a concrete assistance workflow; it is not evidence of a profitable autonomous strategy. Basic can therefore be compared with higher Bitsgap tiers by the extra capacity or controls actually required. [11]
Bitsgap says it adds no trading commission. The connected exchange’s charges still belong in the return calculation, and a subscription remains due even when trading contributes nothing. [12]
OctoBot Pro · Starting rank 3, tied
$29.99 monthly; $5,998 conditional threshold at 0.5%. Pro lists 30 bots, 100 assistant uses per day and TradingView automation. Its $20 monthly premium over Investor Plus buys a larger operating allowance and additional functionality. [1]
If the smaller plan already covers the workflow, the additional capacity has no automatic financial value. If it avoids a required separate service, compare the full affected budget, including that service’s bill.
OctoBot’s exchange-connected model leaves trading funds at the exchange while the software submits orders. That arrangement does not establish self-custody or remove exchange and trading risk. [13]
Coinrule Cloud Investor · Starting rank 3, tied
$29.99 monthly; $5,998 conditional threshold at the starting usage. Investor permits three concurrent agents and one exchange connection. Its 1,000 monthly credits are central to the budget. [3]
Coinrule’s documented language-model workflow translates supplied strategy descriptions or code into structured strategy fields and Python. Successful interpretations and re-interpretations consume credits. Review the generated logic and its execution behavior; a fluent explanation is not a tested strategy. [14]
Track credits across the full workflow. A small account can still create a large usage bill, so capital alone is a poor proxy for the cost of experimentation.
The affiliate link visits the general Coinrule site. Use the separate official Cloud link to verify the product and prices compared here.
Visit Coinrule (affiliate) Current Coinrule Cloud pricing (official)
WunderTrading Pro · Starting rank 5
$49 monthly; $9,800 conditional threshold at 0.5%. Pro is the entry paid tier for live MCP/API execution by an external AI agent; the corresponding developer connections on Free and Basic are for demo use. [15]
The plan’s public limits include 50 signal bots, 100 DCA bots and 20 GRID bots. Those limits describe execution capacity, not an included source of profitable decisions. [4]
Add any model, data or signal subscription that your chosen agent needs. A $20 external model bill, for example, would increase this illustrative fixed budget to $69 and the 0.5% fee-recovery threshold to $13,800. That $20 is an example input, not a quoted bundled charge.
Coinrule Cloud Trader · Starting rank 6
$59.99 monthly; $11,998 conditional threshold at the starting usage. Trader permits ten concurrent agents, five exchange connections and 10,000 monthly credits. [3]
The larger allowance is a measurable reason for its cost to beat Investor at sufficiently high shared usage. It does not mean every reader should upgrade: the lower plan still has the smaller bill inside its allowance, and unused capacity produces no credit rollover.
Coinrule Cloud’s footer says its services are not intended for or marketed to EU/EEA residents. Its terms place trading on third-party exchanges and state that it does not store cryptocurrencies. Check the exact product, residence and exchange eligibility before treating a row as available to you. [3][16]
Visit Coinrule (affiliate) Current Coinrule Cloud pricing (official)
Bitsgap Advanced · Starting rank 7
$69 monthly; $13,800 conditional threshold at 0.5%. Advanced lists ten GRID bots, 50 DCA bots and 180 days of backtest history, with GRID trailing and DCA profit reinvestment controls. [2]
The useful comparison with Basic is whether those limits or controls solve an identified need. Running more bots can spread an unchanged balance across more positions; it does not automatically expand the amount of productive capital or improve diversification.
Use the separate value panel for an upgrade hypothesis. If the benefit is simpler operations or less manual work, document that benefit directly instead of assigning an unsupported return improvement.
Cryptohopper Hero · Starting rank 8
$129 monthly; $25,800 conditional threshold in the default payment case. Hero includes the named AI strategies and AI designer; the lower Explorer and Adventurer plans are not substituted for that feature set. [5]
The AI designer selects among strategies, signal providers or TradingView alerts supplied to it. This is an algorithmic strategy-selection workflow, rather than a bundled general-purpose language model. [17]
Payment method changes the bill. The documented 5% plus $0.50 purchase charge for Apple Pay, Google Pay or Paddle turns $129 into $135.95 before applicable VAT, raising the example threshold to $27,190. Account-balance payment has no purchase fee, which does not prove that funding the balance is free. Paid signals can add another bill. [7][5]
Bitsgap Pro · Starting rank 9
$149 monthly; $29,800 conditional threshold at 0.5%. Pro adds AI Portfolio Mode and take-profit controls for AI-launched bots, with 50 GRID bots, 250 DCA bots and 365 days of backtest history. [2]
Portfolio controls can matter to an operator managing multiple bots, but their existence does not establish an incremental trading edge. Longer historical tests also remain historical tests; they do not measure the next month’s contribution.
Pro has the largest starting fixed bill in this sample. Its place in the table should prompt a concrete capacity-and-controls decision, not a claim that it is the worst product or that a large account makes it automatically worthwhile.
Why this is a selected sample
This is nine plans, not nine independent providers, and it is not a census of the cheapest available bots. Comparing several tiers makes the upgrade and usage questions visible. Free and native-exchange routes remain relevant; the previous total-cost comparison covers those alternatives.
Currency also matters. Altrady’s plans are billed in euros. Gainium’s current terms state payment in USDT, while its pricing page uses dollar displays. Neither is silently treated as an identical USD cash invoice in this fixed-currency table. Their exclusion is a comparison choice, not a judgment on product quality. [18][19][20]
A research assistant that does not execute trades also answers a different purchasing question. ASCN’s current site describes that boundary explicitly. An AI label by itself is insufficient to make two products comparable. [21]
DN Alpha Thesis: use the threshold as a budget filter
The most useful result is often the monthly burden at the capital you already intend to test. It shows whether a fixed subscription dominates a small experiment and whether a cheaper eligible route deserves a closer look. It should not become a target deposit to chase.
Separate three decisions. First, does the plan provide the capability and legal access you need? Second, what is the complete recurring bill at your likely usage? Third, what evidence supports any incremental value over a cheaper baseline? The calculator can organize the second question and illustrate the arithmetic behind the third. It cannot supply the missing evidence.
More capital also changes the real-world problem. Liquidity, order size, concentration, execution quality and market conditions can change as a strategy grows. Holding the same contribution percentage and usage constant is a simplifying assumption, not a scaling promise.
The CFTC has warned about AI-themed trading claims and unrealistic or guaranteed returns. A positive number typed into a calculator does not validate such a claim. [22]
A practical sequence before paying for a plan
- Define the task. Decide whether you need strategy assistance, strategy generation, selection between strategies or execution for your own agent. Check the exact paid feature and supported account.
- Price the whole workflow. Save the current quote, payment method and usage allowance. Add required model, data, hosting or signal costs. Check taxes and the renewal cadence.
- Test the budget at your existing capital. Start with fee burden and several contribution scenarios. Do not increase the assumed return to make the subscription look affordable.
- Track the evidence separately. Reconcile trades, fees and account equity, including open-position effects. A few winning trades or a backtest screenshot is not enough to estimate a reliable future edge.
- Review operational readiness. Use DN’s paper-to-live safety checks. Keep the exported assumptions and compare them with actual bills before renewal.
Methodology and reproducible calculations
This is version 1.0 of the DN AI Trading Subscription Fee-Recovery Dataset, checked on 1 November 2026. Selection required a current paid offer with a documented AI-related capability or external-AI execution connection, plus a usable published monthly dollar price. We included multiple tiers where limits or usage materially change the comparison.
The model uses the invoice amount, its billing period, any selected processing charge, monthly usage and other entered recurring costs. Under annual billing, processing is applied once to the annual subscription invoice and the resulting amount is allocated over twelve months. Usage remains a monthly expense; unused allowance is not carried forward in this model.
Subscription cash bill = base bill + base bill × processing percentage + fixed processing charge.
Monthly fixed cost F = subscription cash bill ÷ billing months + usage overage + other entered monthly bills.
Fee-recovery capital = F ÷ r, only when F and the monthly net contribution rate r are positive.
Modeled monthly surplus at capital C = C × r − F.
Fixed-fee burden = F ÷ C × 100%, when C is positive.
In net mode, the contribution input already reflects variable trading costs. In gross mode, the model subtracts executed-turnover multiple × (weighted venue fee plus the combined execution-shortfall allowance) ÷ 10,000. Maker share is weighted by executed value. The default venue and execution values are illustrative shared assumptions, not measured provider fees or execution quality.
The sensitivity columns use separate 0.25%, 0.5% and 1% net monthly assumptions after variable costs. They do not subtract gross-mode costs a second time. Those columns remain alternative hypothetical cases even when the main scenario has a nonpositive contribution.
Coinrule overage is the excess of entered monthly credits above the selected plan’s allowance, multiplied by $0.02, with no prepaid credit balance assumed. Usage is held fixed while the calculator solves for capital; if your usage rises with capital or turnover, revise the usage input. OctoBot’s default stays within its daily allowance because an extra-capacity tariff was not established.
The optional value test compares the selected plan’s fixed bill with the baseline bill. A positive added fee is divided only by a separately entered positive incremental net edge. Blank edge stays unknown. A zero or negative edge cannot recover a positive added fee; a lower bill is reported as a fee saving without implying equivalent features or better trading outcomes.
Scope limits: no guaranteed return, statistical confidence interval, tax optimization or investment suitability result is produced. Derivative funding, borrowing, leverage and negative maker rebates are outside the default model. Add relevant recurring costs explicitly; account separately for one-off costs, annual cash timing, taxes, foreign exchange, labour and opportunity cost. Reported subscription cash is not the total cash required to operate an account.
Missing required prices remain unknown and unranked. Explicit zero is preserved. Calculations use full precision, display monetary results to cents and give equal displayed-cent thresholds the same competition rank. JSON and CSV downloads record the selected assumptions and calculated results. The calculator runs locally in the page and does not connect to an exchange.
Keep the quote with the calculation
Save a comparison only after replacing the illustrative inputs with your own clearly labeled assumptions. Keep the pricing evidence beside it so a renewal, usage change or revised feature limit can be checked later. For the wider research route, use DN Pathfinder and the linked articles in this series.
Frequently asked questions
What does breakeven capital mean in this article?
It means the trading capital at which an assumed monthly contribution after variable trading costs would equal the entered recurring fixed bill. It is conditional arithmetic, not a recommended deposit, an expected return or proof that the subscription creates value.
Which plan has the lowest starting threshold?
Among the nine selected paid plans, OctoBot Investor Plus has the lowest starting monthly bill at $9.99. With the purely illustrative 0.5% net monthly contribution assumption and no extra entered costs, its fee-recovery threshold is $1,998. This is not a market-wide cheapest or quality ranking.
Can a larger account make a losing strategy cover its subscription?
No. Under a zero or negative contribution after variable trading costs, no finite capital covers a positive fixed bill in this model. More capital does not turn the assumption into a positive edge.
Why can Coinrule Trader cost less than Investor?
Trader has a larger included credit allowance. Under monthly billing, no prepaid balance and identical usage, the published subscription and overage formulas are equal at 2,500 monthly credits. At 5,000 credits, Investor costs $109.99 and Trader $59.99 before other charges.
Why are some annual comparisons unavailable?
A full current annual charge was not verified for every plan. The tool leaves those prices unknown until you enter a confirmed quote. It does not turn a rounded monthly-equivalent label into an independently verified invoice.
Does covering the subscription prove the upgrade was worthwhile?
No. The strategy might have generated the same contribution with a cheaper tool. An upgrade-performance test needs the added fee and a separate incremental contribution assumption relative to the baseline. The calculator leaves that edge blank until you supply it.
Are exchange fees included in the calculation?
In the default net mode, your contribution assumption is already after variable trading costs. In gross mode, the calculator deducts the entered venue and execution-cost assumptions once. Fixed subscription, usage and other entered bills are then deducted separately.
Primary sources
Official pricing and documentation support product and billing facts. Vendor return claims are not adopted. Public prices can change; check the exact product and your current quote before paying.
- Plans & pricing — OctoBot
- Bitsgap plans and pricing
- Coinrule Cloud pricing
- WunderTrading pricing
- Cryptohopper pricing
- Credits explained — Coinrule Docs
- What are the trading fees on Cryptohopper?
- Bitsgap vs Veles: Profit Share vs Subscription
- Plans overview — Coinrule Docs
- AI trading bot — OctoBot
- Bitsgap AI Chat
- Does Bitsgap take a commission on my trades?
- OctoBot cloud frequently asked questions
- How AI parsing works — Coinrule Docs
- AI Trading Bot and Execution for AI Agents
- Terms and Conditions — Coinrule Cloud
- How can I trade with the trading bot?
- Altrady Pricing
- Terms and Conditions — Gainium
- Pricing Plans — Gainium
- ASCN.AI platform
- CFTC: AI Won’t Turn Trading Bots into Money Machines
Freshness and corrections
Version 1.0 · 1 November 2026. Published-price review, conditional fee-recovery calculations and separate upgrade-value test. Send corrections with the affected plan, source and verification date to press@decentralised.news.
