Decentralised News Logo
Crypto Trading

Best Solana Perpetual DEXs in 2027: Ranked by Liquidity, Fees and Execution

Pacifica vs GMTrade vs Jupiter: Which Solana Perpetual DEX Is Best?

Compare the best Solana perpetual DEXs by liquidity, fees, trading volume, execution model, order types, collateral, APIs, mobile support, incentives and security.

Research Verified: 26 July 2026

Editorial Note: Perpetual trading volumes, open interest, liquidity and fees can change quickly. The figures below are a snapshot captured during research and should be rechecked in the live interface before trading.

Summary

The best Solana perpetual DEX depends on whether the trader prioritises order-book execution, pool liquidity, low fees, real-world markets, mobile access or fully on-chain settlement.

Our overall ranking is:

  1. Pacifica for professional execution, advanced order types and API trading
  2. GMTrade for current trading volume, low fees and real-world asset markets
  3. Jupiter Perps for pool liquidity, mobile support and beginner accessibility
  4. Phoenix Perps for fully on-chain order-book execution and transparent fees
  5. Flash Trade for broad market coverage, pool-based liquidity and token incentives
  6. Velocity for low taker fees, maker rebates and advanced trading infrastructure
  7. Adrena for community ownership, zero opening fees and direct token-holder revenue

At the time of research, GMTrade had the highest 30-day perpetual volume among the Solana-native platforms measured here, while Jupiter had by far the largest liquidity pool. Pacifica combined substantial volume and open interest with a professional central-limit-order-book experience. Phoenix offered the clearest fully on-chain order-book architecture but remained smaller by current volume.

Best overall for professional traders: Pacifica
Best current volume and RWA platform: GMTrade
Best for beginners and mobile: Jupiter Perps
Best fully on-chain order book: Phoenix Perps
Best for varied collateral and markets: Flash Trade
Best maker economics and automation: Velocity
Best community-owned alternative: Adrena

Best Solana Perpetual DEXs at a Glance

Rank

Platform

Best For

Base Trading Cost

Execution Model

DN Score

1

Pacifica

Professional and API traders

0.015% maker, 0.040% taker

Hybrid central limit order book

91/100

2

GMTrade

High-volume RWA and crypto trading

From 0.004% to 0.012% per open or close

Oracle-priced liquidity pools

89/100

3

Jupiter Perps

Beginners, mobile users and deep pool liquidity

0.06% per open or close plus impact and borrow costs

Oracle-priced JLP pool

85/100

4

Phoenix Perps

Fully on-chain execution

0.005% maker, 0.035% taker

On-chain FIFO order book and spline liquidity

83/100

5

Flash Trade

Broad asset selection and liquidity incentives

Market-specific, from 0.051% per open or close

Multi-pool oracle-priced execution

77/100

6

Velocity

Maker rebates, bots and cross-collateral

0.035% taker, falling to 0.020%; 0.0025% maker rebate

JIT auctions, DLOB and AMM

73/100

7

Adrena

Community incentives and simple pool trading

No opening fee; 0.14% close fee

Peer-to-pool oracle execution

65/100

The Decentralised News score is an editorial comparison, not a scientific rating or guarantee of platform safety. It weights liquidity, execution, fees, markets, trading tools, developer infrastructure, mobile usability and security disclosures.

The Solana Perpetual DEX Ecosystem

Solana is increasingly capable of supporting several competing perpetual exchange designs:

  • Fully on-chain central limit order books
  • Off-chain matching with on-chain custody or settlement
  • Peer-to-pool exchanges
  • Oracle-priced liquidity pools
  • Just-in-Time liquidity auctions
  • Hybrid order book and AMM systems
  • Real-world asset perpetual markets
  • Automated market-making and keeper networks

The Solana Foundation argues that the network can now support derivatives in which order submission, matching, cancellation, oracle updates and settlement all occur on-chain. It has also acknowledged that much of the wider perpetual market still relies on centralised exchanges or hybrid architectures with off-chain matching engines.

This creates an important distinction. A platform can be built on Solana without every element of its execution system running directly on-chain.

For example:

  • Phoenix prioritises fully on-chain execution.
  • Jupiter uses on-chain trade requests fulfilled by keeper infrastructure.
  • Pacifica uses a high-performance order-book model with Solana-linked accounts.
  • GMTrade and Flash Trade use liquidity pools and oracle-based execution.
  • Velocity combines on-chain orders with keeper-organised liquidity and JIT auctions.

These architectures should not be treated as interchangeable.

Why Ecosystem Directories Are Not Enough

Solana Compass and Alchemy provide useful discovery lists, but directories can continue to display projects after their products have changed, entered testing or stopped operating. Alchemy says its listings combine submissions, editorial research, public information and third-party directories. Solana Compass also makes clear that it is community-run rather than an official Solana Foundation directory.

For this ranking, a platform had to meet all of the following requirements:

  • A working public trading interface
  • Current official documentation
  • Solana-native execution, custody or settlement
  • Verifiable active markets
  • No known suspension of normal trading
  • Enough fee, liquidity or execution information to make a meaningful comparison

Legacy listings were not accepted as proof that a platform remained operational.

Ranking Methodology

1. Liquidity and Market Activity: 30%

We considered:

  • 30-day perpetual volume
  • Open interest
  • Protocol liquidity or TVL
  • Number and quality of active markets
  • Pool utilisation
  • Likely slippage or price impact for larger trades

TVL is not directly comparable across every exchange model. Jupiter’s TVL represents assets held in its pool and trader collateral, while an order-book exchange may require much less locked capital to support high trading volume. Volume, open interest and executable depth therefore matter alongside TVL.

2. Execution Quality: 25%

The review considers:

  • Order-book or pool architecture
  • Matching speed
  • On-chain versus off-chain components
  • Price impact
  • Oracle design
  • Order acknowledgement and cancellation
  • Market, limit and conditional orders
  • Cross and isolated margin availability

3. Fees and Holding Costs: 15%

We evaluated:

  • Maker fees
  • Taker fees
  • Opening and closing fees
  • Price-impact charges
  • Borrowing costs
  • Funding
  • Liquidation charges
  • Token-based discounts and rebates

4. Markets and Collateral: 10%

Higher scores were awarded for:

  • Broad crypto market coverage
  • Stocks, commodities and forex
  • Multi-asset collateral
  • Unified margin
  • Cross and isolated accounts

5. APIs and Mobile Support: 10%

This includes:

  • REST APIs
  • WebSockets
  • SDKs
  • Subaccounts
  • Delegated trading keys
  • Native mobile applications
  • Responsive mobile trading interfaces

6. Security and Decentralisation: 10%

We considered:

  • Self-custody
  • On-chain execution
  • Audit availability
  • Upgrade controls
  • Oracle dependence
  • Liquidation design
  • Pool solvency
  • Socialised-loss or ADL risks

Current Solana Perpetual Liquidity and Activity

Platform

Tracked TVL or Pool Liquidity

30-Day Perpetual Volume

Open Interest

Interpretation

Jupiter Perps

$714.8 million

$4.76 billion

$71.5 million

Deepest pool-based liquidity

GMTrade

$34.7 million

$18.69 billion

$58.4 million

Highest recent turnover in this ranking

Pacifica

$27.8 million

$10.88 billion

$102.7 million

Highest tracked open interest

Phoenix Perps

Not reported as comparable TVL

$79.1 million

$7.1 million

Newer fully on-chain order-book venue

Flash Trade

Approximately $7.5 million

Varies by pool and reporting window

Not consistently reported

Smaller pool base with broad products

Adrena

Approximately $431,000

Limited relative to leaders

Not consistently reported

Smaller community-focused venue

Velocity

No comparable independent figure found

No comparable independent figure found

No comparable independent figure found

Newer independent deployment

Figures are dynamic and were captured from DefiLlama during research. The data shows why a single liquidity number can mislead. Jupiter has more than twenty times GMTrade’s TVL, yet GMTrade recorded substantially higher recent notional volume. Pacifica produced less TVL than either but had the highest reported open interest.

1. Pacifica: Best Overall Solana Perpetual DEX for Professional Traders

Visit Pacifica

Pacifica takes first place because it combines high current activity with one of the most complete professional trading stacks on Solana.

At the time of research, DefiLlama recorded approximately $10.88 billion in 30-day perpetual volume and $102.7 million in open interest. That open-interest figure was higher than Jupiter, GMTrade and Phoenix.

Pacifica Fees

30-Day Volume

Maker Fee

Taker Fee

Below $5 million

0.015%

0.040%

Above $5 million

0.012%

0.038%

Above $10 million

0.009%

0.036%

Above $25 million

0.006%

0.034%

Above $50 million

0.003%

0.032%

Above $100 million

0%

0.030%

Above $250 million

0%

0.029%

Above $500 million

0%

0.028%

Fee tiers update daily using the account’s trailing 30-day volume, with subaccount volume contributing to the master account’s tier.

Execution and Order Types

Pacifica supports:

  • Market orders
  • Limit orders
  • Stop-market orders
  • Stop-limit orders
  • Good-Til-Cancelled orders
  • Immediate-or-Cancel orders
  • Post-only orders
  • Top-of-Book orders
  • Take-profit and stop-loss controls
  • Batch orders through the API

The platform applies a deliberate delay to aggressive order flow. Its changelog currently states that market, GTC and IOC orders are subject to roughly 200 milliseconds of taker latency. This is intended to protect liquidity providers, but latency-sensitive strategies must include it in their execution testing.

Markets and Collateral

Pacifica lists more than 35 perpetual markets, with leverage from 3x to 50x depending on the instrument. It supports cross margin, isolated margin, spot collateral, unified margin and a connected USDC money market.

Its oracle price is updated approximately every three seconds using a weighted basket of external markets. The mark price combines the oracle, Pacifica’s own order book and external perpetual prices.

API Quality

Pacifica has one of the most comprehensive developer offerings in this ranking:

  • REST API
  • WebSocket feeds
  • Batch order support
  • Best-bid-and-offer streams
  • Subaccounts
  • Vault-management endpoints
  • Spot and collateral management
  • Builder codes
  • Model Context Protocol tools for AI agents

Its documentation continued receiving substantial updates through June 2026.

Mobile Support

Pacifica provides a polished web interface that can be used through mobile browsers. A dedicated native mobile application was not identified in the official documentation reviewed.

Pacifica Advantages

  • High current volume and open interest
  • Competitive maker and taker fees
  • Broad perpetual market selection
  • Cross and isolated margin
  • Unified spot collateral
  • Professional APIs and WebSockets
  • Advanced conditional orders
  • Subaccounts and vaults

Pacifica Limitations

  • Hybrid rather than fully on-chain order matching
  • Added taker latency
  • More complex than a pool-based beginner platform
  • Unified margin can transmit losses between positions
  • Restricted in the United States and several other jurisdictions

Best For

Pacifica is the strongest choice for professional discretionary traders, market makers, developers and systematic strategies.

2. GMTrade: Best for Current Volume, Low Fees and RWA Markets

Trade on GMTrade

Referral code: decent

GMTrade ranks second overall and first for current reported trading volume.

At the research date, DefiLlama recorded approximately $18.69 billion in 30-day perpetual volume, $58.4 million in open interest and $34.7 million in TVL. These figures placed GMTrade ahead of the other Solana-native venues in this ranking by recent notional volume.

GMTrade Fees

Market Category

Lower Open or Close Fee

Higher Open or Close Fee

Forex

0.004%

0.006%

Crypto

0.010%

0.012%

Stocks

0.010%

0.012%

Commodities

0.010%

0.012%

The lower fee applies when a trade improves the balance between long and short exposure. The higher fee applies when it increases the imbalance.

These direct trading fees are exceptionally low. They do not represent the total holding cost.

A GMTrade position may also incur:

  • Positive or negative funding
  • Utilisation-based borrowing fees
  • Price impact
  • Solana transaction costs
  • Liquidation risk

Funding adjusts according to the imbalance between long and short open interest. Borrowing charges increase as pool utilisation rises.

Execution Model

GMTrade uses isolated liquidity pools combined with cross-pool coordination.

Its markets can be:

  • Fully backed by assets in the pool
  • Synthetic and backed by alternative pool assets

Trades that improve pool balance can receive more favourable fees and price impact. Trades that make exposure more one-sided may receive higher fees and negative impact.

This is different from a conventional order book. A trader executes against protocol liquidity rather than a visible queue of bids and offers.

Order Types

GMTrade supports:

  • Market positions
  • Limit orders
  • Take-profit orders
  • Stop-loss orders
  • Collateral adjustments
  • Partial position reductions

Its risk system can use auto-deleveraging when synthetic-market profits exceed the backing available to the pool.

Market Selection

GMTrade is one of the strongest Solana platforms for:

  • Cryptocurrency perpetuals
  • Stocks
  • Commodities
  • Forex
  • Other real-world asset markets

The platform describes itself as an RWA-focused Solana perpetual DEX.

GMTrade Advantages

  • Highest current 30-day volume among ranked platforms
  • Very low direct opening and closing fees
  • Strong RWA market coverage
  • Wallet-based Solana access
  • Adaptive funding
  • Price-impact rebates in qualifying cases
  • Multiple isolated liquidity pools

GMTrade Limitations

  • Not a conventional central-limit order book
  • Borrowing and funding costs can exceed direct fees
  • Price impact depends on pool balance
  • Synthetic markets can use auto-deleveraging
  • API and mobile documentation is less extensive than Pacifica or Phoenix

Best For

GMTrade is best for active traders seeking stocks, forex, commodities and crypto markets with low direct fees.

3. Jupiter Perps: Best for Deep Pool Liquidity, Beginners and Mobile Trading

Trade on Jupiter Perps

Jupiter remains the largest Solana perpetual platform by locked pool liquidity.

DefiLlama tracked approximately $714.8 million in TVL, $71.5 million in open interest and $4.76 billion in 30-day perpetual volume during research.

How Jupiter Perps Works

Jupiter uses a trader-to-liquidity-pool model.

Traders borrow assets from the Jupiter Liquidity Provider pool to establish leveraged positions. JLP holders act as the counterparty and receive 75% of the fees generated through perpetual trading, swaps and pool activity.

Trades execute at oracle prices rather than against an order book. This removes conventional order-book slippage, but Jupiter applies a separate price-impact fee to compensate liquidity providers for large or imbalanced positions.

Jupiter Perps Fees

Cost

Current Structure

Opening fee

0.06% of position size

Closing fee

0.06% of position size

Price-impact fee

Variable

Borrow fee

Charged hourly

Token swap fee

May apply

Solana network fee

Applies to transactions

Liquidation penalty

Remaining collateral is forfeited

A $10,000 position opened and later closed normally produces $12 in base fees before adding price impact, hourly borrowing costs and network fees.

Jupiter is therefore not the cheapest Solana perpetual venue by headline fee.

Execution

Each Jupiter perpetual trade involves:

  1. An on-chain request from the trader
  2. Automated fulfilment by a keeper

Price data is drawn from Edge by Chaos Labs, Chainlink and Pyth.

The interface supports:

  • Market orders
  • Limit orders
  • Take-profit orders
  • Stop-loss orders

It does not provide the same depth of order-book controls as Pacifica or Phoenix.

Collateral and Liquidity

The JLP pool currently holds SOL, ETH, wrapped Bitcoin, USDC, USDT and JupUSD. JLP performance depends on pool assets, trader profit and loss, and fee revenue.

Mobile Support

Jupiter has the strongest mobile offering in this ranking.

Jupiter Mobile is available on:

  • iOS
  • Android
  • Solana Seeker
  • Solana Saga
  • Play Solana

The self-custodial application provides direct access to perps, swaps, orders, lending and portfolio management.

Jupiter Advantages

  • Largest pool liquidity
  • Strongest native mobile experience
  • Simple interface
  • Oracle-priced execution
  • Large existing Solana user base
  • Integrated swaps, lending and portfolio tools
  • Multiple independent price feeds
  • JLP liquidity incentives

Jupiter Limitations

  • Higher base trading fees
  • Price-impact and borrow fees
  • Limited advanced order types
  • Pool acts as trader counterparty
  • Smaller market catalogue than Pacifica, Phoenix or Flash
  • Liquidation forfeits remaining collateral

Best For

Jupiter is the clearest choice for beginners, mobile users and traders who value deep pool liquidity over advanced order-book controls.

4. Phoenix Perps: Best Fully On-Chain Solana Perpetual Order Book

Trade on Phoenix Perps

Phoenix is the most compelling choice for traders who prioritise fully on-chain order-book execution.

It is a non-custodial, crankless Solana perpetual exchange. Traders interact with resting limit orders and continuously updated spline liquidity rather than a conventional off-chain matching engine.

Phoenix Fees

Execution

Fee

Maker

0.005%

Taker

0.035%

A $10,000 maker fill costs approximately $0.50, while a taker fill costs approximately $3.50. A limit order can execute partly as a taker before its remaining quantity rests as maker liquidity.

Execution and Order Types

Phoenix provides:

  • FIFO order-book priority
  • Resting limit orders
  • Market orders
  • Advanced orders
  • Reduce-only
  • Post-only
  • Take-profit and stop-loss
  • Cross and isolated accounts
  • Self-trade prevention
  • Spline liquidity
  • Delegated position authority

The live interface displays its order book, funding, mark price, open interest and estimated trading fee.

Markets

Phoenix lists crypto and real-world asset markets.

Official market specifications currently include:

  • Bitcoin
  • Ethereum
  • Solana
  • Apple
  • Nvidia
  • Tesla
  • Amazon
  • Microsoft
  • Gold
  • Silver
  • Copper
  • WTI oil
  • Additional equities and cryptocurrencies

Leverage is market-specific. Current documented RWA leverage reaches 25x for selected commodities and 20x for several equity markets.

Liquidity

Phoenix was materially smaller than Pacifica, GMTrade and Jupiter at the research date. DefiLlama recorded approximately $79.1 million in 30-day volume and $7.1 million in open interest.

That does not invalidate its architecture, but large traders should inspect visible depth before entering.

APIs and Professional Tools

Phoenix provides:

  • REST APIs
  • WebSocket data
  • TypeScript SDK
  • Command-line interface
  • Local paper trading
  • TWAP and grid-strategy runners
  • Delegated trading authorities
  • Builder codes through Flight

A delegated position authority can place and cancel orders but cannot withdraw collateral from the account. This is useful for bots and third-party trading interfaces.

Token Incentives

Phoenix explicitly states that it does not run a points programme or promise a token airdrop. It does operate referral and builder incentives.

Phoenix Advantages

  • Fully on-chain and non-custodial
  • Transparent FIFO order book
  • Competitive maker and taker fees
  • Cross and isolated accounts
  • Strong developer infrastructure
  • Delegated trading keys
  • Crypto and RWA markets
  • No speculative points campaign

Phoenix Limitations

  • Lower current liquidity and open interest
  • Newer product with a shorter operating history
  • USDC is the primary collateral
  • Large orders may face thinner depth
  • No native mobile application identified
  • Limited current token incentives

Best For

Phoenix is best for developers, professional traders and users who place greater value on verifiable on-chain execution than on maximum liquidity.

5. Flash Trade: Best for Broad Markets, Pool Liquidity and Trader Incentives

Trade on Flash Trade

Flash Trade is a Solana-native, asset-backed spot and perpetual exchange using a multi-pool, peer-to-pool model.

Its current documentation describes standard leverage of up to 100x, with a separate high-risk Degen Mode supporting much higher leverage for selected markets.

Flash Trade Markets

Flash supports a broad selection including:

  • Bitcoin
  • Ethereum
  • Solana
  • BNB
  • Zcash
  • Solana ecosystem tokens
  • Meme coins
  • Gold and silver
  • Forex
  • Crude oil
  • Tokenised equity-linked markets

Official onboarding documentation lists assets such as Nvidia, MicroStrategy, SPY, Circle and Tesla-linked instruments alongside crypto, forex and metals.

Flash Trade Fees

Market Group

Open or Close Fee

Major crypto pool

0.051%

Forex

0.08%

Metals

0.10%

Crude oil

0.15%

Solana ecosystem assets

0.11%

Meme markets

0.12%

Positions can also incur utilisation-based margin fees and swap costs.

Execution

Flash uses oracle-derived pricing and multi-asset liquidity pools.

Liquidity providers act as counterparties to traders and receive a portion of:

  • Opening and closing fees
  • Margin fees
  • Swap fees
  • Liquidation proceeds
  • Liquidity-management fees
  • Trader losses

Pool fee shares vary, with many pools directing between 70% and 90% of relevant fees to liquidity providers.

Token Incentives

The FAF token provides:

  • Trading-fee discounts
  • Higher referral rebates
  • Liquidity-yield boosts
  • Governance
  • Activity rewards

Voltage Points are earned through trading, liquidity provision and referrals.

API and Security

Flash provides a TypeScript SDK for deposits, trading and integrations. Its documentation lists security reviews from Offside Labs and Halborn, together with an economic stress audit covering its margin engine and liquidity pools.

Mobile Support

The web interface is usable through mobile browsers. Flash has documented mobile chart and simulation improvements, but a dedicated native application was not identified.

Flash Trade Advantages

  • Broad crypto and RWA market coverage
  • Several liquidity pools
  • Oracle-priced execution
  • TypeScript SDK
  • Public security reports
  • FAF token benefits
  • Liquidity-provider revenue
  • Wallet-based Solana access

Flash Trade Limitations

  • Higher fees than Pacifica, GMTrade, Phoenix and Velocity
  • Utilisation-based margin costs
  • Pool-specific complexity
  • Very high leverage options
  • RWA markets follow traditional market hours
  • Liquidity is fragmented across several pools

Best For

Flash is best for traders seeking varied markets, pool-based execution and direct token incentives.

6. Velocity: Best for Low Fees, Maker Rebates and Trading Automation

Explore Velocity

Referral status: Decentralised News does not currently have a verified Velocity referral link. The link above is neutral.

Velocity is an independent Solana protocol forked from the Drift Protocol v2 codebase. It operates under its own program ID and concentrates on perpetual futures, token swaps, lending and borrowing. It should not be described simply as a renamed Drift deployment.

Velocity Fees

30-Day Volume

Taker Fee

Maker Rebate

Below $2 million

0.035%

0.0025%

$2 million to $10 million

0.030%

0.0025%

$10 million to $20 million

0.0275%

0.0025%

$20 million to $80 million

0.025%

0.0025%

$80 million to $200 million

0.0225%

0.0025%

At least $200 million

0.020%

0.0025%

The maker rebate remains flat across all tiers. The structure is based on 30-day volume rather than governance-token staking.

Execution

Velocity combines three sources of liquidity:

  • Just-in-Time auctions
  • An on-chain decentralised limit order system organised by keepers
  • A virtual automated market maker

Market orders enter a short auction, currently around five seconds by default, during which market makers can compete to provide execution before the AMM becomes the backstop.

Order Types and APIs

Velocity supports:

  • Market orders
  • Limit orders
  • Trigger orders
  • Stop losses
  • Take profits
  • Post-only orders
  • Reduce-only orders
  • Immediate-or-Cancel
  • Subaccounts
  • Delegated accounts
  • Keeper bots
  • JIT market-making bots
  • Liquidation bots
  • TypeScript SDK
  • Data APIs
  • DLOB WebSocket data

Its developer documentation is among the most extensive in this ranking.

Collateral

USDT is the principal quote and settlement asset. Other deposited assets can earn lending yield while contributing risk-adjusted collateral to perpetual positions. For example, SOL collateral receives a reduced weight compared with USDT.

Funding

Velocity applies hourly funding and currently includes a baseline annualised funding offset of approximately 10.95%. The actual payment depends on market divergence, direction and position size. Traders should therefore inspect funding carefully before holding longer-term positions.

Security Limitation

Velocity inherited code previously reviewed through Drift audits, but those audits do not cover every Velocity-specific change or its independent deployment. A post-fork OtterSec audit was still in progress when this article was researched.

Velocity Advantages

  • Lowest base taker fee among the order-book-style platforms ranked
  • Maker rebate at every tier
  • Advanced order types
  • Strong SDK and bot documentation
  • Cross-collateral lending and trading
  • On-chain transparency
  • JIT and DLOB liquidity
  • Insurance-fund and keeper infrastructure

Velocity Limitations

  • Newer independent deployment
  • Comparable volume and liquidity figures were not available
  • Dedicated post-fork audit not yet published
  • Approximately five-second default JIT auction
  • Complex cross-margin system
  • Socialised-loss and unsettled-profit risks
  • Baseline funding offset can increase holding costs

Best For

Velocity is best for technically sophisticated traders, developers, market makers and users seeking maker rebates.

7. Adrena: Best Community-Owned Solana Perpetual DEX

Trade on Adrena

Adrena is a permissionless, open-source peer-to-pool perpetual exchange built on Solana.

It uses a multi-asset liquidity pool, oracle pricing and a two-token system built around ADX governance and ALP liquidity.

Adrena Fees

Action

Fee

Open a position

0%

Add collateral

0%

Close a position

0.14%

Liquidation

Normal close fee only

USDC pool mint

0%

USDC pool redeem

0.10%

Borrow fee

Variable by utilisation

Adrena’s fee model concentrates the direct trading charge at position closure. Borrowing costs can rise substantially as pool utilisation increases.

Execution

Adrena provides:

  • Oracle-priced trades
  • No conventional order-book price impact
  • Permissionless wallet access
  • Up to 100x leverage
  • Open-source keeper automation
  • Take-profit and stop-loss tools
  • Peer-to-pool liquidity

The pool acts as the trader’s counterparty. This provides a simpler experience but creates liquidity-provider exposure to profitable traders.

Token Incentives

ADX holders participate in governance and currently receive a share of protocol revenue. ALP represents liquidity-pool ownership and earns a larger share of trading revenue.

Security

Adrena’s documentation lists V2 reviews from Fidesium and Offside Labs, with V1 audits from OtterSec and Offside Labs.

Liquidity Limitation

DefiLlama tracked only approximately $431,000 in pool TVL at the research date. This is substantially below the liquidity associated with Jupiter, GMTrade, Pacifica and Flash.

Adrena Advantages

  • No opening fee
  • No additional liquidation penalty
  • Permissionless wallet trading
  • Direct community token economics
  • Audited V1 and V2 deployments
  • Open-source keeper infrastructure
  • Straightforward pool-based model

Adrena Limitations

  • Limited current liquidity
  • 0.14% close fee
  • Variable borrowing costs
  • Smaller market catalogue
  • Pool-counterparty risk
  • Less comprehensive API infrastructure
  • Not suitable for large orders without checking capacity

Best For

Adrena is best for smaller traders who value community ownership and straightforward peer-to-pool execution.

Solana Perpetual DEX Fee Comparison

Platform

Entry Cost

Exit Cost

Other Important Costs

Pacifica

0.015% maker or 0.040% taker

Same

Funding and slippage

GMTrade

0.004% to 0.012%

0.004% to 0.012%

Price impact, funding and borrowing

Jupiter

0.06%

0.06%

Price impact and hourly borrowing

Phoenix

0.005% maker or 0.035% taker

Same

Funding and order-book slippage

Flash Trade

0.051% to 0.15%

Same

Margin and swap fees

Velocity

Maker rebate or 0.020% to 0.035% taker

Same

Funding, borrow interest and builder fees

Adrena

0%

0.14%

Utilisation-based borrowing

The fee table does not identify the universally cheapest platform.

For example:

  • A market order on GMTrade can have a low direct fee but significant negative price impact.
  • A zero-slippage Jupiter trade can incur a price-impact fee and hourly borrow charges.
  • A Pacifica or Phoenix order can obtain a low maker rate but fail to fill.
  • Velocity can pay a maker rebate but has a baseline funding offset.
  • Adrena charges no entry fee but concentrates the charge at exit.

The correct comparison is total round-trip cost.

Execution Models Compared

Platform

Execution Model

Main Strength

Main Trade-Off

Pacifica

Hybrid central limit order book

Professional execution and APIs

Off-chain matching dependency

GMTrade

Oracle-priced isolated pools

Low fees and broad markets

Pool imbalance and price impact

Jupiter

Oracle-priced JLP pool

Deep pool and simple execution

Higher fees and limited orders

Phoenix

Fully on-chain FIFO order book

Transparency and composability

Smaller current depth

Flash Trade

Multi-pool oracle model

Broad market and collateral support

Fragmented liquidity

Velocity

JIT, DLOB and AMM

Flexible maker participation

Complexity and auction delay

Adrena

Peer-to-pool oracle model

Simple wallet execution

Smaller pool capacity

Which Solana Perpetual DEX Has the Best Liquidity?

Best Pool Liquidity: Jupiter

Jupiter has by far the largest pool and the clearest capacity for large oracle-priced trades. Its price-impact fee can still make an oversized or unbalanced position expensive.

Highest Recent Turnover: GMTrade

GMTrade led the ranked group by 30-day notional volume during the research snapshot. This suggests strong recent activity, although turnover alone does not guarantee narrow price impact on every market.

Highest Current Open Interest: Pacifica

Pacifica had the highest tracked open interest, indicating substantial outstanding positions and active trader participation.

Best Visible On-Chain Order Book: Phoenix

Phoenix exposes its order-book-based execution directly on Solana. It remains materially smaller than the volume leaders, so depth should be checked on the specific pair.

Which Solana Perpetual DEX Has the Lowest Fees?

Lowest Pool-Trading Fees: GMTrade

GMTrade’s direct opening and closing rates begin at 0.004% for forex and 0.010% for crypto and RWA markets. Funding, borrowing and price impact must still be included.

Best Maker Economics: Velocity

Velocity pays a 0.0025% maker rebate across every volume tier.

Best Order-Book Fees for Regular Traders: Phoenix

Phoenix charges 0.005% for makers and 0.035% for takers without requiring high trading volume.

Best High-Volume CLOB Fees: Pacifica

Pacifica reaches zero maker fees and a 0.028% taker fee for accounts exceeding $500 million in 30-day volume.

Order Types Compared

Feature

Pacifica

GMTrade

Jupiter

Phoenix

Flash

Velocity

Adrena

Market

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Limit

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Limited model

Stop market

Yes

Yes

TP/SL

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Stop limit

Yes

Not clearly documented

No

Advanced

Market-specific

Yes

No

Take profit

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Reduce-only

Yes

Yes

Position close

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Post-only

Yes

No pool equivalent

No

Yes

No pool equivalent

Yes

No pool equivalent

IOC

Yes

No pool equivalent

No

Yes

No pool equivalent

Yes

No pool equivalent

Cross margin

Yes

Pool-specific

Position-specific

Yes

Pool-specific

Yes

Pool-based

Isolated margin

Yes

Market-specific pools

Position-based collateral

Yes

Pool-specific

Isolated pools documented

Pool-based

Collateral and Margin Comparison

Pacifica

USDC is the principal settlement asset. Eligible spot holdings can contribute towards unified collateral at reduced loan-to-value ratios. Cross and isolated margin are supported.

GMTrade

The available collateral depends on the liquidity pool and market. Users choose the market, pool and supported collateral asset before opening a position.

Jupiter

Liquidity is drawn from the JLP pool containing SOL, ETH, wrapped Bitcoin and several stablecoins. Position profit and loss is settled in the relevant underlying collateral token.

Phoenix

Phoenix currently uses USDC as its primary collateral and supports independent portfolios, cross accounts and isolated subaccounts.

Flash Trade

Collateral and liquidity are separated across multi-asset pools. Different pools support major crypto, Solana assets, meme coins and synthetic markets.

Velocity

USDT is the primary quote asset. SOL and other supported assets can earn lending yield while contributing risk-adjusted margin.

Adrena

The ALP multi-asset pool supplies liquidity and acts as the counterparty to traders.

Token Incentives Compared

Platform

Incentive Structure

Pacifica

Points, referrals, builder and market-maker programmes

GMTrade

GT incentives, referrals and VIP discounts

Jupiter

JLP fee income and JUP ecosystem incentives

Phoenix

Referrals and builder fees; no points or promised token airdrop

Flash Trade

FAF staking, fee discounts, yield boosts and Voltage Points

Velocity

Referral discounts, keeper rewards and insurance-fund staking

Adrena

ADX governance and revenue share; ALP liquidity revenue

Incentives should not replace analysis of execution quality. Points may never convert into a valuable token, and token rewards can lose value faster than fee savings accumulate.

Mobile Trading Comparison

Best Native Mobile Experience: Jupiter

Jupiter provides native iOS and Android applications, alongside support for Solana mobile devices.

Best Mobile Web Interfaces

Pacifica, GMTrade, Phoenix and Flash Trade provide browser-based interfaces that can be used from mobile devices.

Most Limited Mobile Experience

Velocity and Adrena remain better suited to desktop wallet workflows and advanced users. Traders should test order management and emergency position closing from their own mobile device before relying on it.

API and Algorithmic-Trading Ranking

Rank

Platform

Why

1

Pacifica

REST, WebSocket, batch orders, subaccounts, builder tools and MCP

2

Phoenix

SDK, API, CLI, paper trading, delegated keys and strategy runners

3

Velocity

Extensive TypeScript SDK, DLOB feeds, keeper and JIT bot guides

4

Flash Trade

TypeScript SDK and direct protocol integrations

5

GMTrade

Rust SDK and on-chain pool infrastructure

6

Jupiter

Strong general Jupiter infrastructure but simpler perp execution controls

7

Adrena

Open-source keepers but less comprehensive public trading APIs

Developers should test real-world acknowledgement latency, WebSocket gaps, cancellation behaviour, rate limits and recovery after disconnection. Documentation quality does not guarantee production reliability.

Security and Decentralisation Comparison

Platform

Main Security Strength

Important Risk

Pacifica

Wallet authentication and documented risk controls

Hybrid matching and operational infrastructure

GMTrade

On-chain pools and audited status

Pool solvency, oracle and ADL risk

Jupiter

Large audited protocol and multiple price feeds

Keeper, oracle and JLP counterparty exposure

Phoenix

Fully on-chain, non-custodial and crankless

Newer protocol and smaller liquidity base

Flash Trade

Multiple technical and economic audits

Pool, oracle and high-leverage risk

Velocity

Open-source on-chain program and inherited audit history

Velocity-specific post-fork audit unfinished

Adrena

Multiple V1 and V2 audits

Small liquidity pool and peer-to-pool exposure

No Solana perpetual DEX is risk-free.

Major risks include:

  • Smart-contract vulnerabilities
  • Oracle errors
  • Network congestion
  • Keeper or matcher outages
  • Pool insolvency
  • Auto-deleveraging
  • Socialised losses
  • Collateral depegs
  • Failed liquidations
  • API-key compromise
  • Governance or upgrade-key abuse

Best Solana Perpetual DEX for Beginners

First Choice: Jupiter Perps

Jupiter has the easiest onboarding, strongest mobile support and simplest execution model.

The trader should still understand:

  • Leverage
  • Borrow fees
  • Price-impact fees
  • Liquidation
  • Oracle pricing
  • JLP counterparty mechanics

Second Choice: GMTrade

GMTrade can offer low direct fees and broad markets, but beginners must understand funding, borrowing and pool price impact.

Platforms Beginners Should Approach Carefully

  • Pacifica, because of unified margin and advanced order controls
  • Phoenix, because of order-book mechanics
  • Velocity, because of cross-collateral, funding and unsettled PnL
  • Flash, because of pool complexity and high leverage
  • Adrena, because limited liquidity can constrain execution

Best Solana Perpetual DEX for Professional Traders

Best Overall: Pacifica

Pacifica combines volume, open interest, APIs, subaccounts, advanced orders and competitive fees.

Best for Fully On-Chain Strategies: Phoenix

Phoenix is the clearest option for developers who want orders, margin and execution to remain on-chain.

Best for Market Makers: Velocity

Velocity provides maker rebates, JIT auctions, keeper systems and extensive bot documentation.

Best for RWA Trading: GMTrade

GMTrade combines stocks, commodities and forex with substantial recent volume and low direct fees.

Best for Pool-Based Liquidity Strategies: Jupiter and Flash

Both allow liquidity providers to earn from trader activity, but LPs take the opposite side of trader profit and loss.

Platforms Not Included in the Ranking

Drift

Drift was excluded because it is not currently operating as a normal live trading venue. The platform halted operations following a major security incident in April 2026, and the user specifically requested only working platforms.

Velocity is an independent fork of the earlier Drift v2 codebase. It is not the same deployment and should be evaluated separately.

BULK

BULK appears in ecosystem directories and currently maintains an active public website. However, comparable live fee, market and public-mainnet trading data could not be confirmed to the same standard as the ranked venues during this review. It remains a project to monitor rather than a ranked recommendation.

Bumpin and Other Directory Listings

Several names appear in third-party data or directories without sufficiently detailed current official documentation. They were not ranked simply because a directory or TVL page continued to display them.

TurboFlow

TurboFlow was not ranked as a Solana-native platform because current tracked liquidity is primarily associated with another blockchain rather than Solana.

Final Verdict

The Solana perpetual market no longer has one obvious winner.

Pacifica ranks first overall because it provides the best current balance of execution, market activity, fees, margin tools and APIs.

GMTrade ranks first for recent turnover and RWA trading. Its direct fees are exceptionally low, although funding, borrowing and price impact must be monitored.

Jupiter remains the liquidity and mobile leader. It is the best starting point for less experienced users, but its all-in costs can be higher.

Phoenix is the most important fully on-chain order-book contender. It offers transparent fees and strong professional tooling, but liquidity remains smaller.

Flash Trade offers the broadest pool-based market mix and substantial token incentives, although fees vary considerably across asset classes.

Velocity has compelling maker economics and automation infrastructure, but it is a newer independent deployment with limited public liquidity data and an unfinished post-fork audit.

Adrena offers the strongest community-ownership thesis, but its current liquidity makes it more suitable for smaller positions.

The best professional setup may involve more than one venue:

  • Pacifica for order-book execution
  • GMTrade for RWA markets and low fees
  • Jupiter for deep pool liquidity and mobile access
  • Phoenix for fully on-chain strategies
  • Velocity for maker rebates and bots

Traders should route each position according to the live market rather than committing exclusively to one protocol.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the best Solana perpetual DEX?

Pacifica is the best overall choice for professional traders. GMTrade leads for recent trading volume and RWA markets, while Jupiter is best for pool liquidity, mobile access and beginners.

Which Solana perpetual DEX has the most liquidity?

Jupiter has the largest tracked liquidity pool. Its TVL was approximately $714.8 million at the research date.

Which Solana perpetual DEX has the most volume?

GMTrade had the highest tracked 30-day perpetual volume among the live native platforms in this comparison, at approximately $18.69 billion.

Which Solana perpetual DEX has the lowest fees?

GMTrade has the lowest direct pool-trading fees, beginning at 0.004% for forex and 0.010% for crypto and RWA markets. Phoenix has particularly competitive order-book fees, while Velocity offers a maker rebate.

Which platform is best for professional traders?

Pacifica is the strongest all-round professional platform because of its order types, subaccounts, APIs, WebSockets, volume and open interest.

Which platform is best for beginners?

Jupiter Perps has the simplest interface and strongest native mobile support.

Which platform has a fully on-chain order book?

Phoenix provides fully on-chain, non-custodial and crankless perpetual execution on Solana.

Which Solana DEX supports stocks and commodities?

GMTrade, Flash Trade and Phoenix support real-world asset-linked markets. Their market hours, leverage and liquidity differ.

What happened to Drift?

Drift ceased normal operation after a major 2026 security incident and is not included among currently working platforms.

Is Velocity the new name for Drift?

No. Velocity is an independent protocol forked from the Drift v2 codebase and deployed under its own Solana program ID.

Does Decentralised News have a Velocity referral link?

No verified Velocity referral link is currently available. The article uses a neutral platform link.

Does Decentralised News have a GMTrade referral link?

Yes. Use the Decentralised News GMTrade referral link.

The referral code is decent.

Affiliate Disclosure

The GMTrade link in this article is an affiliate or referral link. Decentralised News may receive compensation or platform rewards when eligible readers register or trade through it, at no additional cost to the reader.

Decentralised News does not currently have referral links for Pacifica, Jupiter, Phoenix, Flash Trade, Velocity or Adrena. Affiliate relationships do not determine the ranking, security analysis or conclusions.

Educational Disclaimer

This article is for educational and informational purposes only. It does not constitute financial, investment, legal, tax or trading advice.

Perpetual futures are leveraged products that can result in rapid and total loss. Positions may be liquidated or auto-deleveraged. Funding, borrowing costs, fees, liquidity and market availability can change without notice. Smart contracts, wallets, APIs, oracles, keepers, matching engines and blockchain networks can fail or be exploited.

Verify current fees, markets, audit reports and jurisdictional availability before depositing. Never trade with money you cannot afford to lose. For adults aged 18 and over.

Newsletter

Get the most talked about stories directly in your inbox

About Us

We are dedicated to delivering the best digital asset news, reviews, guides, interviews, and more. Stay tuned!

Email: press@decentralised.news

Copyright © 2026 Decentralised News. All rights reserved.