{
  "schemaVersion": 1,
  "id": "paradex-vs-grvt",
  "version": "1.1.0",
  "name": "Paradex vs GRVT",
  "reviewedAt": "2026-10-22",
  "reviewIntervalDays": 14,
  "reviewer": "Decentralised News editorial research",
  "evidenceType": "documentation_comparison",
  "liveTested": false,
  "summary": "Current documentation sharpens the comparison rather than producing an overall winner. Paradex Retail/Pro routing now has explicit speed bumps, limits and fee schedules; GRVT MAM now exposes CVRs, 9-tier trading fees and repayment charges. Both still leave live execution, permissions and user-specific eligibility unmeasured.",
  "scope": "2 pinned documentation briefs compared by decision condition. Not a live execution test, security audit, exhaustive product inventory or individual eligibility assessment.",
  "comparisonContext": "Paradex Retail/Pro order treatment and GRVT Single-Asset/Multi-Asset margin are different kinds of settings. This comparison preserves those distinctions and does not equate their accounts, networks or cost schedules.",
  "comparisonParticipants": [
    "paradex",
    "grvt"
  ],
  "sources": [],
  "networks": [
    {
      "id": "perpetuals",
      "name": "Perpetual trading across distinct product scopes",
      "collaterals": [],
      "collateralNote": "Market, account and route dependent. No universal collateral equivalence or shared deployment is asserted."
    }
  ],
  "illustration": null,
  "rows": [
    {
      "id": "mode",
      "label": "Classification and account mode",
      "meaning": "Paradex order classification and GRVT margin mode are different controls. Check both the submission route and the account's haircut-adjusted margin setting before comparing capital efficiency.",
      "paradex": "Retail status is determined by submission route: UI and interactive-JWT orders are Retail; standard API orders default to Pro, and exceeding Retail limits switches treatment.",
      "paradexSources": [
        "orders"
      ],
      "grvt": "MAM currently supports USDT and USDC with documented CVRs and enabled-collateral controls; Single-Asset Mode counts USDT only.",
      "grvtSources": [
        "margin"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "collateral",
      "label": "Usable collateral and debt",
      "meaning": "Total account value is not available margin. GRVT's broader collateral model adds debt and conversion mechanics that Paradex's USDC-only perp margin does not.",
      "paradex": "Non-USDC balances contribute to account value but not free collateral; USDC remains required for perpetual trading in the reviewed collateral guide.",
      "paradexSources": [
        "collateral"
      ],
      "grvt": "Perps settle in USDT. Under MAM, USDC can contribute haircut-adjusted collateral, while a USDT shortfall can create borrow interest and later repayment/conversion fees.",
      "grvtSources": [
        "margin"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "fees",
      "label": "Fee conditions",
      "meaning": "Zero Retail commission and maker rebates are not all-in cost conclusions. Match route/tier and include holding, borrowing and repayment costs.",
      "paradex": "Retail maker/taker fees are 0% across Perps, Spot and Options. Pro maker fees are 0.003%, while Pro taker fees use a 14-day combined-volume schedule starting at 0.045% with documented discounts and a 0.0175% floor.",
      "paradexSources": [
        "fees"
      ],
      "grvt": "The current 9-tier schedule ranges from maker rebates of -0.0001% to -0.0030% and taker fees of 0.0450% to 0.0240%; MAM debt repayment can add 0.1%+ conversion fees depending on repayment path.",
      "grvtSources": [
        "fees"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "funding",
      "label": "Balance and funding interpretation",
      "meaning": "Check the resulting asset after a deposit or conversion. Holding a token, counting it as margin and settling a trade in it are distinct conditions.",
      "paradex": "The collateral guide says non-USDC balances contribute to total account value but not free collateral, and USDC is required for perpetual markets.",
      "paradexSources": [
        "collateral"
      ],
      "grvt": "The USDC deposit article describes automatic conversion to USDT through Rhino. The newer MAM guide separately describes USDC held as collateral.",
      "grvtSources": [
        "deposit",
        "margin"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "withdrawal",
      "label": "Withdrawal conditions",
      "meaning": "Use the account-specific withdrawable amount and live route quote. Neither static rule set establishes observed payout speed or reliability.",
      "paradex": "Withdrawable USDC is bounded by free collateral and account USDC balance; margin health is checked every five seconds and liquidation begins at 100% margin ratio.",
      "paradexSources": [
        "risk"
      ],
      "grvt": "Static pages still differ slightly: the fee page lists network-specific flat fees, while the withdrawal article describes several Rhino routes as 1 USDT plus bridge gas.",
      "grvtSources": [
        "fees",
        "withdrawal"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "execution",
      "label": "Execution and liquidation limits",
      "meaning": "Configured queue treatment and liquidation mechanics are not comparable execution-quality measurements. No speed/safety winner is supported.",
      "paradex": "Retail orders have 300 ms order/cancel speed bumps, low documented rate limits, RPI access and queue priority; Pro orders have no speed bump and higher limits. DN has not measured realised fills.",
      "paradexSources": [
        "orders"
      ],
      "grvt": "MAM can trigger automatic conversions or liquidation when haircut-adjusted margin deteriorates; DN has not reproduced those paths.",
      "grvtSources": [
        "margin"
      ]
    },
    {
      "id": "evidence",
      "label": "What remains unmeasured",
      "meaning": "Current permissions, individual eligibility and independently observed fills and withdrawals remain unverified.",
      "paradex": "This review does not establish individual eligibility, API permission safety or live withdrawal and stop-loss reliability.",
      "paradexSources": [],
      "grvt": "This pinned snapshot provides no independent measurements of execution, withdrawal reliability or individual eligibility.",
      "grvtSources": []
    }
  ],
  "unknowns": [
    "Matched executable quotes including entry, holding and exit costs",
    "Independent fill, stop-loss and withdrawal reliability",
    "Current permissions, recovery and revocation behaviour",
    "Individual eligibility and current regional restrictions"
  ],
  "history": [
    {
      "date": "2026-10-22",
      "type": "DN evidence refresh",
      "detail": "Comparison refreshed to Paradex 1.1.0 and GRVT 1.1.0 after primary-source review. No live fill, borrowing, withdrawal, permission or eligibility test was performed."
    },
    {
      "date": "2026-10-14",
      "type": "DN publication",
      "detail": "Initial comparison of pinned documentation snapshots. Evidence coverage differs; unsupported conditions remain unknown."
    }
  ],
  "reviewTriggers": [
    "Changed official product, fee, margin or withdrawal documentation",
    "A substantiated correction",
    "The earliest underlying editorial review deadline"
  ],
  "disclosure": "DN may receive compensation through commercial links elsewhere on the site. This comparison has no trading CTA or payout-based ranking. Documentation does not establish current operational status, safety or user eligibility.",
  "evidenceSnapshots": {
    "paradex": {
      "schemaVersion": 1,
      "id": "paradex",
      "version": "1.1.0",
      "name": "Paradex",
      "reviewedAt": "2026-10-22",
      "reviewIntervalDays": 14,
      "reviewer": "Decentralised News editorial research",
      "evidenceType": "provider_documentation",
      "liveTested": false,
      "summary": "Paradex still classifies orders by submission method rather than permanent user type. Current docs make the trade-offs explicit: Retail orders have 300 ms order/cancel speed bumps, much lower rate limits, zero fees across Perps/Spot/Options, RPI access and queue priority, while Pro orders use the API fee schedule and no speed bump.",
      "scope": "Provider-documentation review focused on perpetual trading. Not an exhaustive product inventory, live execution test, security audit or individual eligibility assessment.",
      "decisionTitle": "The order route changes the trading conditions.",
      "decisionContext": "Do not treat Retail as a permanent identity. Check how each order is submitted, its resulting classification and the margin actually available.",
      "sources": [
        {
          "id": "orders",
          "name": "Paradex Retail and Pro orders",
          "url": "https://docs.paradex.trade/trading/trader-profiles",
          "reviewedAt": "2026-10-22"
        },
        {
          "id": "fees",
          "name": "Paradex trading fees",
          "url": "https://docs.paradex.trade/trading/trading-fees",
          "reviewedAt": "2026-10-22"
        },
        {
          "id": "collateral",
          "name": "Paradex non-USDC balances and collateral",
          "url": "https://docs.paradex.trade/trading/spot-trading/non-usdc-balances-collateral",
          "reviewedAt": "2026-10-22"
        },
        {
          "id": "risk",
          "name": "Paradex risk checks",
          "url": "https://docs.paradex.trade/risk/paradex-risk-checks",
          "reviewedAt": "2026-10-22"
        }
      ],
      "networks": [
        {
          "id": "paradex",
          "name": "Paradex perpetual trading (review scope)",
          "collaterals": [],
          "collateralNote": "USDC required for perps in the reviewed collateral guide; non-USDC balances are not free collateral."
        }
      ],
      "claims": [
        {
          "id": "classification",
          "question": "What makes an order Retail or Pro?",
          "label": "Provider-reported",
          "finding": "Orders remain classified by how they are submitted. Web UI and interactive-JWT API orders are Retail; standard API orders default to Pro. Exceeding Retail limits automatically switches the account to Pro-order behavior and removes RPI access.",
          "consequence": "Treat order classification as route-dependent and potentially dynamic. Automation can change fee, queue and execution conditions without a separate user-profile change.",
          "sourceIds": [
            "orders"
          ]
        },
        {
          "id": "fees",
          "question": "Does every order receive zero trading fees?",
          "label": "Provider-reported",
          "finding": "Retail maker and taker fees are currently 0% across Perps, Spot and Options. Pro Perps/Spot maker orders have a flat 0.003% fee; Pro taker fees use a 14-day combined-volume schedule starting at 0.045% and can be reduced by documented discounts, with a 0.0175% floor.",
          "consequence": "A zero-fee Retail headline is not an API cost estimate. Confirm the actual order class, product, 14-day tier and discounts before estimating trading cost.",
          "sourceIds": [
            "fees"
          ]
        },
        {
          "id": "execution",
          "question": "What trade-off accompanies Retail treatment?",
          "label": "Provider-reported",
          "finding": "Retail orders have documented 300 ms order-submission and cancellation speed bumps, 3 orders/sec, 30/min, 300/hr and 1,000/24h limits, plus RPI access and queue priority. Pro orders have no speed bump and substantially higher API limits.",
          "consequence": "These configuration differences do not establish realised fill quality. DN has not measured latency, queue advantage or slippage for either route.",
          "sourceIds": [
            "orders"
          ]
        },
        {
          "id": "collateral",
          "question": "Does total account value equal usable perp collateral?",
          "label": "Provider-reported",
          "finding": "The collateral guide says non-USDC balances contribute to total account value but not free collateral, and USDC is required for perpetual markets.",
          "consequence": "Do not count a non-USDC spot holding as available perp margin. The guide describes broader collateral support as future work.",
          "sourceIds": [
            "collateral"
          ]
        },
        {
          "id": "withdrawals",
          "question": "Can the whole displayed balance always be withdrawn?",
          "label": "Provider-reported",
          "finding": "Current risk checks evaluate account health every five seconds. Withdrawable USDC is capped by both free collateral and the account's USDC balance, with liquidation triggered when margin ratio exceeds 100%.",
          "consequence": "Account value, free collateral and withdrawable USDC remain distinct. The documented formula does not establish observed withdrawal speed or liquidation outcomes.",
          "sourceIds": [
            "risk"
          ]
        },
        {
          "id": "access",
          "question": "Has DN independently checked access and permissions?",
          "label": "Unknown",
          "finding": "This review does not establish individual eligibility, API permission safety or live withdrawal and stop-loss reliability.",
          "consequence": "Check current terms and access controls separately. Provider documentation is not an independent safety endorsement.",
          "sourceIds": []
        }
      ],
      "illustration": null,
      "unknowns": [
        "Current executable quotes and all-in holding costs",
        "Independent fill, stop-loss and withdrawal reliability",
        "Live signing permissions and revocation behaviour",
        "Individual eligibility and current regional restrictions"
      ],
      "history": [
        {
          "date": "2026-10-22",
          "type": "DN evidence review",
          "detail": "Re-opened the four cited Paradex documentation pages. Core Retail/Pro, USDC-collateral and withdrawal conclusions remain supported; this version adds current speed-bump, rate-limit and fee-tier details. No live execution, permission, withdrawal or eligibility test was performed."
        },
        {
          "date": "2026-10-14",
          "type": "DN publication",
          "detail": "Initial documentation brief. Account-specific conditions and evidence limits are preserved in this version."
        }
      ],
      "reviewTriggers": [
        "Changed official product, fee or margin documentation",
        "A substantiated correction",
        "The 14-day editorial review deadline"
      ],
      "disclosure": "DN may receive compensation through commercial links elsewhere on the site. This brief contains no trading CTA or payout-based ranking. A documentation review does not establish current operational status or user eligibility."
    },
    "grvt": {
      "schemaVersion": 1,
      "id": "grvt",
      "version": "1.1.0",
      "name": "GRVT",
      "reviewedAt": "2026-10-22",
      "reviewIntervalDays": 14,
      "reviewer": "Decentralised News editorial research",
      "evidenceType": "provider_documentation",
      "liveTested": false,
      "summary": "GRVT still separates Single-Asset and Multi-Asset Margin, with USDT settlement and USDC collateral support under MAM. Current docs now specify CVRs, hourly borrowing, current 9-tier trading fees and MAM repayment charges, while withdrawal pages still differ slightly on route-fee presentation.",
      "scope": "Provider-documentation review of GRVT perpetual trading. Not a live execution test, exhaustive product inventory, security audit or individual eligibility assessment.",
      "decisionTitle": "Check the margin mode before counting your collateral.",
      "decisionContext": "Deposit currency, usable margin and settlement currency are separate questions. Confirm the actual account mode and funding route before relying on a general USDC-support statement.",
      "sources": [
        {
          "id": "margin",
          "name": "GRVT multi-asset margin guide",
          "url": "https://help.grvt.io/en/articles/16857432-multi-asset-margin-a-complete-guide",
          "reviewedAt": "2026-10-22"
        },
        {
          "id": "deposit",
          "name": "GRVT USDC deposit route",
          "url": "https://help.grvt.io/en/articles/12275552-depositing-usdc-into-grvt",
          "reviewedAt": "2026-10-22"
        },
        {
          "id": "fees",
          "name": "GRVT fee model",
          "url": "https://help.grvt.io/en/articles/9614699-how-does-grvt-s-fee-model-work",
          "reviewedAt": "2026-10-22"
        },
        {
          "id": "withdrawal",
          "name": "GRVT deposit and withdrawal fees",
          "url": "https://help.grvt.io/en/articles/9635479-are-you-charging-any-fees-on-deposits-and-withdrawals",
          "reviewedAt": "2026-10-22"
        }
      ],
      "networks": [
        {
          "id": "grvt",
          "name": "GRVT perpetual trading (review scope)",
          "collaterals": [],
          "collateralNote": "The MAM guide lists USDT and USDC; Single-Asset Mode uses USDT. Haircuts and account settings affect usable margin."
        }
      ],
      "claims": [
        {
          "id": "collateral",
          "question": "Does holding USDC always provide margin?",
          "label": "Provider-reported",
          "finding": "MAM currently supports USDT and USDC; USDT is always enabled and USDC is enabled by default but can be toggled. Current CVRs are documented at 99.8% for USDT and 99.5% for USDC, so Margin Balance is haircut-adjusted rather than equal to Total Equity.",
          "consequence": "Check margin mode, enabled collateral and haircut-adjusted Margin Balance rather than using raw stablecoin balances as buying power.",
          "sourceIds": [
            "margin"
          ]
        },
        {
          "id": "borrowing",
          "question": "Can a stablecoin balance still create a borrowing cost?",
          "label": "Provider-reported",
          "finding": "Perpetuals still settle in USDT. Under MAM, a USDT shortfall can auto-borrow USDT against other collateral and accrue hourly interest. Current docs also describe manual, automated and liquidation repayment paths with conversion fees.",
          "consequence": "Model debt interest and repayment/conversion fees separately from trading fees and funding. A positive Total Equity balance does not rule out USDT debt.",
          "sourceIds": [
            "margin"
          ]
        },
        {
          "id": "deposit",
          "question": "Is the deposit route the same as collateral support?",
          "label": "Provider-reported",
          "finding": "The USDC deposit article describes automatic conversion to USDT through Rhino. The newer MAM guide separately describes USDC held as collateral.",
          "consequence": "These describe different flows. Verify the selected deposit preview and resulting asset; do not assume every USDC deposit stays USDC.",
          "sourceIds": [
            "deposit",
            "margin"
          ]
        },
        {
          "id": "fees",
          "question": "Which fee schedule applies?",
          "label": "Provider-reported",
          "finding": "The current fee page uses a 9-tier 30-day-volume schedule. Perps maker rates range from -0.0001% to -0.0030% and taker rates from 0.0450% to 0.0240%. Under MAM, converting collateral to repay USDT debt adds a fee with a 0.1% floor; current USDC examples are 0.1% manual, 0.125% automated and 0.25% liquidation repayment.",
          "consequence": "Use the current tier and order side, then add funding, borrow interest and any repayment conversion fee. Maker rebates do not imply a negative all-in trading cost.",
          "sourceIds": [
            "fees"
          ]
        },
        {
          "id": "withdrawal",
          "question": "Can a single published withdrawal figure cover every route?",
          "label": "Documentation difference",
          "finding": "The fee-model page currently lists flat network amounts such as 2 USDT on Ethereum, 1.01 USDT on Arbitrum/BNB, 1.5 USDT on Solana and 1.4 USDT on Tron. The dedicated withdrawal article instead describes Ethereum as 2 USDT and Rhino routes such as Arbitrum/Base/BNB/Tron/KAIA/Solana as 1 USDT plus Rhino gas.",
          "consequence": "A small documentation difference remains. Use the live withdrawal quote and route rather than relying on either static page as a universal total.",
          "sourceIds": [
            "fees",
            "withdrawal"
          ]
        },
        {
          "id": "risk",
          "question": "Does multi-asset collateral prevent liquidation?",
          "label": "Provider-reported",
          "finding": "MAM measures liquidation risk against haircut-adjusted Margin Balance. The current guide says margin-call notification occurs at 90% MMR and liquidation begins at 100%, with automatic conversions possible during stressed repayment paths.",
          "consequence": "Multi-asset collateral increases flexibility but does not eliminate liquidation or conversion risk. DN has not reproduced these events.",
          "sourceIds": [
            "margin"
          ]
        }
      ],
      "illustration": null,
      "unknowns": [
        "Current executable quotes and all-in holding costs",
        "Independent fill, stop-loss and withdrawal reliability",
        "Live signing permissions and revocation behaviour",
        "Individual eligibility and current regional restrictions"
      ],
      "history": [
        {
          "date": "2026-10-22",
          "type": "DN evidence review",
          "detail": "Re-opened the four cited GRVT help pages. This version adds current CVRs, 9-tier fee rates and MAM repayment-fee mechanics, and narrows the remaining withdrawal documentation difference. No live trade, borrow, conversion, withdrawal or eligibility test was performed."
        },
        {
          "date": "2026-10-14",
          "type": "DN publication",
          "detail": "Initial documentation brief. Account-specific conditions and evidence limits are preserved in this version."
        }
      ],
      "reviewTriggers": [
        "Changed official product, fee or margin documentation",
        "A substantiated correction",
        "The 14-day editorial review deadline"
      ],
      "disclosure": "DN may receive compensation through commercial links elsewhere on the site. This brief contains no trading CTA or payout-based ranking. A documentation review does not establish current operational status or user eligibility."
    }
  }
}
